Peak(s):  Hunts Peak  -  13,071 feet
Bushnell Peak  -  13,105 feet
Twin Sisters North  -  13,012 feet
Date Posted:  11/21/2019
Modified:  11/26/2019
Date Climbed:   11/13/2019
Author:  supranihilest
 A-Hunts-ing We Will Go With Little Twin Sisters North's Bushnell Rifle Scope   

That title was reeeeeally a stretch, wasn't it? But then again you aren't here for the title of this report, are you?

The northernmost three thirteeners in the Sangre are among the range's shortest; Hunts Peak, Twin Sisters North, and Bushnell Peak are the range's 66th, 73rd, and 64th highest ranked thirteeners, respectively, out of 73. Despite their relatively short stature they involve large amounts of elevation gain in a relatively short horizontal distance. This is balanced out by the fact that they're all just pretty easy from the western/San Luis Valley side with short approaches (if one has a 4WD vehicle, anyway) and ancient mining roads snaking up their western flanks to reduce the difficulty even further. Tedious talus on Bushnell and Twin Sisters North and extra loose terrain in the Ox Cart fire's (2013) nearly vegetation-less burn scar on Hunts pose the only real difficulties on these peaks. Many people choose to climb them in transitionary periods between seasons like this due to their ease and lack of technical difficulty, which is exactly what I did.

Table of Contents

Monday, November 11, 2019
-- Bushnell Peak
-- Twin Sisters North
-- Statistics
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
-- Hunts Peak
-- Statistics

Monday, November 11, 2019

The trailhead for Bushnell Peak and Twin Sisters North isn't really a trailhead. It's on public land but isn't anything official and requires driving on the maze of 4WD roads that twist and snake through the desert east of US 285 to the base of the mountains. I climbed up the Brook Creek drainage to Bushnell's west ridge, parking my car in a large, grassy area near a funky junction off Saguache County Road 57 that's actually two sets of Y-junctions. I'm not sure if the roads beyond this point are really named or labeled, as they certainly aren't on any maps I could find. A map is probably the best thing to show the area.

A little blurry due to JPEG compression but still mostly readable. Source: Secondary source:

This of course meant hiking several miles on the dirt road before reaching the mountains or cover of trees.

Easy road hiking until I reached the mountains.
Bushnell Peak with Twin Sisters South to the left and Mount Otto to the right. The route ascends up the left facing ridge left of the snowy slope and then up the prominent ridge just left of center. It does not ascend the entire ridge proper.
Point 12,924 (left) and Twin Sisters North (right).

The roads weren't marked on the map I had on my Garmin inReach so I was glad to have a GPX track for the road on my watch; I could have figured it out probably but it might have taken me longer to do so. The dusty desert road eventually led into the forest and its drivable portion ended abruptly in deadfall. It faintly snuck off into the trees, largely reclaimed by the local environs.

Not really a road and hardly even a trail at this point!

Along the way I encountered an old cabin I assume to be from some kind of mining activity. Not much seems to have occurred here in the Sangre but these old roads into unnamed and poorly trafficked basins seem to say otherwise.

Ramshackle. I just like saying that word. Ramshackle.

The road continued through the forest gaining elevation and snow cover in equal measures. Eventually it was almost entirely snow covered, most of which was of terrible quality. I was sometimes lucky enough to have a few feet at a time of nice, solid crust to walk briskly on before punching in anywhere from ankle to knee deep. Shady spots seemed to be better. I followed a mountain lion's tracks up, envious of its lack of postholing.

More road. Sometimes it was difficult to tell where it went, with trees and brush overgrowing it.
That's one big kitty.

While it only took me an hour or so to climb the road to treeline it felt like it took a lot longer than that. It certainly took more effort than it should have due to the awful snow quality. Arriving at treeline the basin opened up and route finding changed from determining whether a snowy, indistinct area was actually a switchback to what the best way to link grass and rock piles poking through the sunbaked snow on the upper slopes of the peak.

There's more snow than appears in this photo.
There's less snow than appears in this one. Mix the two and you get a somewhat exhausting exercise of trying to avoid snow as much as possible and failing miserably at it.

The route from treeline also gets a little steeper. It cuts off prior to the final end of the road which just continues farther up the basin before disappearing into thin air. It's better to leave the road and head due south on a kind of rib that merges into the west ridge.

The road is visible to the right of center, behind and on both sides of the largest tree.

Fortunately as I ascended the snow was more and more melted out. Eventually I didn't have much trouble staying on dry ground, which was good because I was in trail runners and my shoes and socks were soaked. In mid-November. Yup, I do it to myself. The terrain also began shifting into more and more talus, the large, blocky, obnoxious kind that's just kind of like walking around drunkenly on, except you're sotally tober, opister, raises index finger to object but falls on face instead.

Looking up the route. Get you somma dat talus.

As I edged up farther a false summit came into view. It was still too low and too far away to be the true summit but served as a nice landmark for me to hike towards.

The false summit (right) en route.

Along the way I got a good view of the traverse across the Twin Sisters (oh boy!) and also had the opportunity to do some fun, optional scrambling on very solid rock.

Twin Sisters South in the foreground with Twin Sisters North marking the start of the ridge that goes off to the right.
There were several sections like this where scrambling up to Class 3 on knobby conglomerate rock (of a different type than that found in the Crestones; the clasts here are smaller) could be had.
These sections could be skipped and the route otherwise would have gone at Class 2 or possibly Class 2+ max with intentional route finding.

The scrambling improved the route quality and raised my spirits above what was, to this point, just a long slog on an unexciting road and lot of snow and talus. Linking together as many short sections of scrambling as I could I reached the summit of Bushnell Peak, which was really just a continuation of the long Sangre backbone.

Looking south towards the majority of the Sangre de Cristo Range.
North with the majority of the traverse in view. Hunts Peak is the tiny, dark triangle in the rear.

Not wanting to waste time as it was already almost 1pm (I had gotten a late start) I reversed back down Bushnell, sticking closer to the ridge separating Brook Creek and Bushnell Lakes drainages. The routes I ascended and descended mostly converged but I did have the opportunity to scramble a new section or two. The ridge eventually cut north and returned to the Class 2 talus found elsewhere on the mountain. It stayed at Class 2 for the remainder of the day.

The short hike from the Bushnell/Twin Sisters South saddle to the small, pointy summit of the south peak was the highlight of the day. Though it was easy and involved no scrambling it was simply an enjoyable tundra stroll up a beautiful pyramid, unique among all the otherwise uninspiring talus.

Twin Sisters South.
Looking back at Bushnell Peak. The left, rugged side drops down to Bushnell Lakes. The right side drains Brook Creek and is the way I came up.
The remaining terrain to Twin Sisters North.

Between the Twin Sisters was mostly more talus. A short, easy hike later and I was on top of the Sangre's shortest ranked 13er, Twin Sisters North.

Open slopes up Twin Sisters North.
The only semi-decent view, looking north towards Hunts Peak.

I contemplated making the traverse over to Hunts Peak, the last 13er north along the ridge, but it was nearly 2pm and Hunts was approximately three miles away on a long, rocky ridge with two 12ers blocking easy access. I figured I wouldn't have the time nor did I know which roads to take back to my car from that far north, so I turned around and began descending the massive, steep talus field that makes up the Twin Sisters southwest face. This descent was the worst part of the day by far, worse than postholing all morning. It was super steep and very loose. I'm normally a very careful climber on this type of terrain and I still sent a couple large rocks crashing down the face. If you go down this way with a partner(s) try to space yourselves laterally so you aren't eating each other's rockfall. If I were to do these peaks again I would traverse back to Bushnell and go down the way I came up; the southwest face works and is far more direct but I cannot recommend it due to how steep and loose it is.

Probably 30 to 40 degrees of suck.

I picked my way down tediously until hitting the trees. While the angle of the slope didn't really relent here the loose stuff did and I was able to move a little quicker down the grass. Two short drainages appeared and I worked my way over into the lefthand one as its walls were a little less steep to get into.

Start of the trees.
The left drainage. It merged with the other drainage down a little lower.

The terrain backed off in steepness at this point and hiked quickly through the drainage which eventually had water rushing under my feet. I of course soaked them completely stepping onto what I thought was solid grass but turned out to just be a mud-filled hole, sinking up to my ankles in the muck. So much for staying dry for the upcoming snow on the road. Eventually the trickle of water paralleled the road and I hiked up the embankment to rejoin my tracks, which had softened in the warmth of the day. Since I had broken trail coming up it was a lot faster and easier going down and I progressed back to the dry, open road with ease. Once back on the open road I was able to run and did so all the way back to my car in an effort to save time. I had to work the next day (remote, which meant a library) so I drove to Salida, ate Amica's Pizza (highly recommended; my second favorite after High Mountain Pies in Leadville), and slept in my car in a pull-off near the Shavano/Tabeguache trailhead. Bushnell and Twin Sisters North are are kind of a grunt but an easy one on peaks that you'll probably have to yourself; go get 'em.

Bonus shot of some of the unique rock of the area.
Bonus shot of some of the unique rock of the area.


Climbers: Ben Feinstein (myself)
Trailhead: Near Saguache County Road 57 and unnamed forest service roads (38.3196, -105.9546)
Total distance: 12.21 miles
Total elevation gain: 5,754 feet
Total time: 7:16:41
Peaks: Two ranked thirteeners

  • Bushnell Peak, 13,105'
  • Twin Sisters North, 13,012'


Starting Location Ending Location Via Time (h:mm:ss) Cumulative Time (h:mm:ss) Rest Time (m:ss)
Parking Bushnell Peak 3:31:34 3:31:34 0:00
Bushnell Peak Twin Sisters North 1:05:32 4:37:06 0:00
Twin Sisters North Parking 2:39:35 7:16:41 Trip End

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Similar to Bushnell and the Twin Sisters, Hunts Peak doesn't have an official trailhead though the parking area is on public land. Once again though I couldn't drive to it and was forced to park approximately four miles away, almost immediately off US 285. Ah, the life of a mountain-obsessed nerd with a carboard box for a car.

Map showing the area. It's probably best to follow the directions to the Rock Creek trailhead here on Map source: Secondary source:

The morning dawned calm and cool, around 17 degrees. The sunrise was spectacular this morning.

Crank it up.

I only had the one peak today, and then I was going back to Salida to work for a few hours, so I took my time getting ready. It was early but I was feeling great. I headed out when it was fully light out.

Hunts Peak peaking (hur dur) out in the early morning.

Striking off on the road I found it wet, muddy, and rutted. Definitely a good thing I didn't try to drive my cardboard box up here, then I'd just have a soaking wet cardboard box full of holes instead.

Stay right to Rock Creek.
Crossing of Rock Creek right before the drivable road ends.

There's a locked gate just past the Rock Creek crossing. Along the way there's parking and several camp sites, and one can park after the crossing too if desired. Past the gate the road is still obvious but is being revegetated due to lack of use.

On Forest Service maps this is marked as "4WD" but it's gated and not actually accessible by vehicle; foot travel is A-OK.

The road quickly turned snowy, but unlike Bushnell and the Twin Sisters I didn't have to break trail. The road was packed down nicely, probably by numerous hunters. This saved me a ton of time and effort and I was grateful I didn't have to start the day off with wet feet, having opted once again for trail runners instead of boots.

Mmm, packed trail.
Beginning of the burn scar.

The Ox Cart fire burned 1,152 square acres, which is relatively small, and yet the destruction was obvious everywhere around me. Entire hillsides as far as the eye could see had been torched leaving only bleached, barren trunks, standing like a forest of toothpicks instead.

Almost lifeless.
Forest of phantoms.

The burn scar was both fascinating and somber. The slight breeze whistled a sad melody through the branches. Evidence of new life was already popping up but I hadn't seen such destruction before. The ground below the snow was loose and rocky with nothing to hold it together and made for slow progress on account of its instability. I rounded a switchback and instead of going up a somewhat dry, west-facing slope I continued to the northern toe of a rib off the west ridge, thinking that extra distance on the road would be faster. This ended up being snowy and awful, with knee deep sugar snow on the nearly tractionless surface below.

Swimming uphill. I "Class 2+ed" the trees to make this short, crappy section better.

While this section was short it was the worst part of the day by far. I considered going back down and around to the partially melted area but trucked through and topped out on the rib to find easier going ahead.

Still pretty snowy but at least it was flat.

I jetted across the rib to the west ridge proper, getting a full view of the remaining ground to the summit. It was all easy but there was significantly more elevation gain than the easy view belied; from the saddle below me to the summit it looked like maybe a few hundred feet but in actuality was around 1,000 feet. Someone had obviously been up before me since the last snow so I followed their tracks while trying to stay on grass as much as possible.

Hunts Peak ain't a head turner, but she's still pretty.

The uppermost slopes were dry and the tracks I followed were still nicely crusted and supportive, so it didn't take me long before I was standing on top of Hunts Peak.

Hunts' short summit ridge vaguely reminds me of a comma.
Looking south with most of Colorado's Sangre in view.
Looking north-northwest towards the Sawatch. Mount Ouray is the prominent peak on the far left, with the east ridge route facing the viewer and the Devil's Armchair partially in shadow.

I goofed around on the summit for a few minutes and signed the soaking wet summit register with a dull pencil, careful not to tear the paper. I'm sure the first person to attempt to sign it in a freeze is going to utterly destroy the thing. The pen in the register tube was dry so I took it with me to throw away. Turning back down the brief summit ridge I took the full west ridge in; I'd attempt to avoid going down the exact way I came up, to avoid the bad snow I'd encountered before.

The ascent and descent don't take the full ridge but the rib closest to the viewer. Antora Peak (left) and Mount Ouray (right), the Sawatch's southern terminus, make a nice backdrop.

Returning quickly to the rib I started a downward traverse along it. It was fairly steep and without much holding the slope together it was easier to switchback and gradually lose elevation than go directly down it; I lost footing several times before learning that I did not, in fact, like falling on my ass. I'm such a smart cookie, I know.

Into the fire and the flame.
The soft snow actually helped improve traction, since it kind of held things together. Otherwise this was a lot of cobble, dirt, and decayed ash loosely piled onto everything.

A quick descent back to the tracked out road, which itself went swiftly back to the gate, and a short run of the several miles of valley roads got me back to my car just after 1pm, which meant I could work a few hours in Salida before heading home to Boulder. An easier day than Bushnell and the Twin Sisters, I might recommend waiting a few more years to do Hunts, if you can. That will allow a little more growth of grasses and shrubs to help hold the burn scar together, since that was really the only part of this hike that wasn't all that nice. As always though, the peak exists and is thus a worthy endeavor.


Climbers: Ben Feinstein (myself)
Trailhead: Rock Creek 2WD near US 285 (38.3714, -106.0339)
Total distance: 14.24 miles
Total elevation gain: 4,789 feet
Total time: 6:11:24
Peaks: One ranked thirteener

  • Hunts Peak, 13,071'


Starting Location Ending Location Via Time (h:mm:ss) Cumulative Time (h:mm:ss) Rest Time (m:ss)
Parking Hunts Peak 3:37:41 3:37:41 7:34
Hunts Peak Parking 2:26:09 6:11:24 Trip End

Version history:

Date Notes
November 21, 2019 Original publication.
November 26, 2019 Added version history, uploaded GPX that I forgot to include with original publication. Please note that both tracks were reduced in size (i.e. number of points) as they were over the 8MB upload limit but they will still be perfectly usable for navigation.

My GPS Tracks on Google Maps (made from a .GPX file upload):

Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

Comments or Questions
Speed on Hunts..
11/24/2019 16:15
Over 14 miles in a little over 6 hours? You certainly move faster than I do - but maybe that's not saying much LOL!

I enjoyed Hunts a lot and after reading your report on Bushnell & Twin Sisters, I'm gonna have to give those a shot. I can guarantee they will take me longer than the 7+ hours it took you.

Nice report, Ben.

Good read
11/25/2019 15:59
You've been picking some inspiring peaks lately--for a nihilist.

Check out (again, years later) my report on Bushnell. Your FJ will get to the end of the road with ease unless there's treefall.
Our stats were 6.5 miles, 4352' gain. That's a little shorter! I think we parked near the above "end of drivable road" marker, where the road turned to trail and disappeared into the trees. The pictured cabin wasn't far from that point.
I still have the directions we used from Covill and Mitchler.

Shorter day
11/25/2019 16:13
@Jay: When I get a road to hike, which is like 90% of everything (soon to change in a 4x4 Sprinter!) I go fast. With Hunts being like 2/3 flat, dry road from where I started it didn't take long to pound that part out, an hour and change going up and less than an hour running down. Definitely give Bushnell and Twin Sisters a go, and like Matt said you'll be able to drive a significant chunk of it with a beefier vehicle.


11/26/2019 10:40
Thanks to both of you! And Matt, I see that I commented on your TR back in 2011 (when I was only 60-something), that I had to put them on my to-do list. That damn list just keeps growing!

two lunches
11/09/2021 09:36
i learned something today- thanks ben

11/09/2021 12:09
Such a great word!

   Not registered?

Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.

Please respect private property: supports the rights of private landowners to determine how and by whom their land will be used. In Colorado, it is your responsibility to determine if land is private and to obtain the appropriate permission before entering the property.

© 2022®, 14ers Inc.